For example: Though women have sexual freedom they don’t have true commitment. Since sex is readily available?
Though women are competing and succeeding in the work force, yet they are failing at home with absent parenting in both single/dual income families?
When making more money yet the supply of men who makes as much or more are in short supply.
And finally, women making the money and yet men still have to pay to maintain some semblance of femininity?
Apathy from men towards relationships and family roles.
talk about questions from another decade!
sexual freedom does not indicate a lack of commitment in a committed relationship. sexual freedom means a woman can declare what she wants in the bedroom and have a one night stand if she chooses or not. it’s sexual freedom, not mandated sexual activity.
many mothers work and raise healthy, happy, well adjusted children.
and it is simply not possible for many families to survive financially on one income.
why does a woman have to make as much or less than her partner?
income is income. if a man feels emasculated by the fact that his partner makes more than him that is his issue, not hers.
men do not have to pay. it is considered custom to some people but like society it is changing. our children may consider this an antiquated notion by the time they are young adults and dating.
and if a man is apathetic to his familial responsibiltiy that is not his wife/partner’s fault. it is his. how does feminism cause apathy by men toward relationships and family roles.
please include some sources to back up your claims next time.